Assess ongoing maintenance
Understand whether the application can be maintained with a manageable level of work.
We assess an existing application to decide whether to maintain, improve or replace it. We review available workflows, code and documentation and explain the options, limitations and dependencies.
Before expanding or replacing a tool, it helps to understand its foundations. The review connects what the team needs with what the current system can support.
Understand whether the application can be maintained with a manageable level of work.
Identify dependencies and boundaries before adding functions or changing the interface.
Arrange a review of the delivered work, documentation and agreed user journeys.
Compare gradual improvements with rebuilding, taking data and continuity into account.
We define which code, documentation and user journeys we can review. Each conclusion states its supporting evidence and the limits of the checks performed.
These are the elements we define in the proposal. The final scope depends on your starting point and business priorities.
We agree on the components, access, features and questions the review should cover.
We examine the structure, dependencies and documentation in the materials available.
We review representative user journeys and how they meet the team's needs.
We propose priorities and options for maintenance, improvement or replacement, with their assumptions.
We hand over the access, documentation and guidance covered by the agreed scope. Follow-up or maintenance is defined separately if commissioned.
We agree the questions to answer and the features, code and documentation we can inspect.
We review representative workflows, structure and components within the available scope.
We relate findings to the team’s needs to assess maintenance, improvements or replacement.
We explain priorities and alternatives, stating what has been checked and what needs further review.
Recommendations start with how you work. A tool that suits another business may not fit your budget or processes.
We state what has been reviewed, what is outside the scope and what needs further investigation. A focused review is not presented as a comprehensive audit.
You can use the findings to decide with your team or another supplier. If you continue with SBI Digital, we define a separate implementation phase.
No. A general application review is not a specialist audit or a penetration test. If that assessment is needed, it requires its own scope and suitably qualified professionals.
We can assess the experience and visible behaviour, but conclusions about the technical foundations will be limited. We make clear what could not be verified.
The first conversation helps us understand your needs and assess whether we can help. A detailed assessment or review has a scope, deliverable and price agreed before work begins.
No. You can use the analysis with your own team. Implementation, coordination with other suppliers or further support is quoted separately if you need it.
We request only what is needed for the agreed scope. We can start with interviews, documentation and demonstrations; any additional access is agreed with a clear purpose and permissions.
Engineering × Design.
For the next step.